Java provides the
java.util.zip package for zip-compatible data compression. It provides classes that enable you to read, create, and modify ZIP and GZIP file formats.
A number of security concerns must be considered when extracting file entries from a ZIP file using
java.util.zip.ZipInputStream. File names may contain path traversal information that may cause them to be extracted outside of the intended directory, frequently with the purpose of overwriting existing system files. Directory traversal or path equivalence vulnerabilities can be eliminated by canonicalizing the path name, in accordance with FIO16-J. Canonicalize path names before validating them, and then validating the location before extraction.
A second issue is that the extraction process can cause excessive consumption of system resources, possibly resulting in a denial-of-service attack when resource usage is disproportionately large compared to the input data. The zip algorithm can produce very large compression ratios [Mahmoud 2002]. For example, a file consisting of alternating lines of a characters and b characters can achieve a compression ratio of more than 200 to 1. Even higher compression ratios can be obtained using input data that is targeted to the compression algorithm. This permits the existence of zip bombs in which a small ZIP or GZIP file consumes excessive resources when uncompressed. An example of a zip bomb is the file 42.zip, which is a zip file consisting of 42 kilobytes of compressed data, containing five layers of nested zip files in sets of 16, each bottom layer archive containing a 4.3 gigabyte (4 294 967 295 bytes; ~ 3.99 GiB) file for a total of 4.5 petabytes (4 503 599 626 321 920 bytes; ~ 3.99 PiB) of uncompressed data. Zip bombs often rely on repetition of identical files to achieve their extreme compression ratios. Programs must either limit the traversal of such files or refuse to extract data beyond a certain limit. The actual limit depends on the capabilities of the platform and expected usage.
Noncompliant Code Example
This noncompliant code fails to validate the name of the file that is being unzipped. It passes the name directly to the constructor of
FileOutputStream. It also fails to check the resource consumption of the file that is being unzipped. It permits the operation to run to completion or until local resources are exhausted.
Noncompliant Code Example (
This noncompliant code attempts to overcome the problem by calling the method
ZipEntry.getSize() to check the uncompressed file size before uncompressing it. Unfortunately, a malicious attacker can forge the field in the ZIP file that purports to show the uncompressed size of the file, so the value returned by
getSize() is unreliable, and local resources may still be exhausted.
Acknowledgement: The vulnerability in this code was pointed out by Giancarlo Pellegrino, researcher at the Technical University of Darmstadt in Germany, and Davide Balzarotti, faculty member of EURECOM in France.
In this compliant solution, the code validates the name of each entry before extracting the entry. If the name is invalid, the entire extraction is aborted. However, a compliant solution could also skip only that entry and continue the extraction process, or it could even extract the entry to some safe location.
Furthermore, the code inside the
while loop tracks the uncompressed file size of each entry in a zip archive while extracting the entry. It throws an exception if the entry being extracted is too large—about 100MB in this case. We do not use the
ZipEntry.getSize() method because the value it reports is not reliable. Finally, the code also counts the number of file entries in the archive and throws an exception if there are more than 1024 entries.
|The Checker Framework|
|Tainting Checker||Trust and security errors (see Chapter 8)|
CWE-409, Improper Handling of Highly Compressed Data (Data Amplification)
Guideline 1-1 / DOS-1: Beware of activities that may use disproportionate resources
Android Implementation Details
Although not directly a violation of this rule, the Android Master Key vulnerability (insecure use of
ZipEntry) is related to this rule. Another attack vector, found by a researcher in China, is also related to this rule.
|||IDS04-J. Safely extract files from ZipInputStream LiveLesson|