Methods can return values to communicate failure or success or to update local objects or fields. Security risks can arise when method return values are ignored or when the invoking method fails to take suitable action. Consequently, programs must not ignore method return values.

When getter methods are named after an action, a programmer could fail to realize that a return value is expected. For example, the only purpose of the ProcessBuilder.redirectErrorStream() method is to report via return value whether the process builder successfully merged standard error and standard output. The method that actually performs redirection of the error stream is the overloaded single-argument method ProcessBuilder.redirectErrorStream(boolean).

Noncompliant Code Example (File Deletion)

This noncompliant code example attempts to delete a file but fails to check whether the operation has succeeded:

public void deleteFile(){

  File someFile = new File("someFileName.txt");
  // Do something with someFile
  someFile.delete();

}

Compliant Solution

This compliant solution checks the Boolean value returned by the delete() method and handles any resulting errors:

public void deleteFile(){

  File someFile = new File("someFileName.txt");
  // Do something with someFile
  if (!someFile.delete()) {
    // Handle failure to delete the file
  }

}

Noncompliant Code Example (String Replacement)

This noncompliant code example ignores the return value of the String.replace() method, failing to update the original string. The String.replace() method cannot modify the state of the String (because String objects are immutable); rather, it returns a reference to a new String object containing the modified string.

public class Replace {
  public static void main(String[] args) {
    String original = "insecure";
    original.replace('i', '9');
    System.out.println(original);
  }
}

It is especially important to process the return values of immutable object methods. Although many methods of mutable objects operate by changing some internal state of the object, methods of immutable objects cannot change the object and often return a mutated new object, leaving the original object unchanged.

Compliant Solution

This compliant solution correctly updates the String reference original with the return value from the String.replace() method:

public class Replace {
  public static void main(String[] args) {
    String original = "insecure";
    original = original.replace('i', '9');
    System.out.println(original);
  }
}

Risk Assessment

Ignoring method return values can lead to unexpected program behavior.

Rule

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

EXP00-J

Medium

Probable

Medium

P8

L2

Automated Detection

Tool
Version
Checker
Description
CodeSonar

JAVA.NULL.RET.UNCHECKED
JAVA.FUNCS.IRV

Call Might Return Null (Java)
Ignored Return Value (Java)

Coverity7.5CHECKED_RETURNImplemented
Parasoft Jtest
CERT.EXP00.NASSIG
CERT.EXP00.AECB
Ensure method and constructor return values are used
Avoid "try", "catch" and "finally" blocks with empty bodies
PVS-Studio

V6010, V6101
SonarQube

S2201

S899

Return values from functions without side effects should not be ignored

Return values should not be ignored when they contain the operation status code

SpotBugs

RV_RETURN_VALUE_IGNORED
RV_RETURN_VALUE_IGNORED_INFERRED
RV_RETURN_VALUE_IGNORED_NO_SIDE_EFFECT
RV_RETURN_VALUE_IGNORED_BAD_PRACTICE
RV_RETURN_VALUE_OF_PUTIFABSENT_IGNORED
RR_NOT_CHECKED
SR_NOT_CHECKED

Implemented

Related Guidelines

SEI CERT C Coding Standard

EXP12-C. Do not ignore values returned by functions

SEI CERT C++ Coding Standard

VOID EXP12-CPP. Do not ignore values returned by functions or methods

ISO/IEC TR 24772:2010

Passing Parameters and Return Values [CSJ]

MITRE CWE

CWE-252, Unchecked Return Value

Bibliography

[API 2006]

method delete()
method replace()

[Green 2008]

String.replace

[Pugh 2009]

Misusing putIfAbsent

[Seacord 2015]