Many common operating systems usch as Windows and UNIX support file links including hard links, symbolic (soft) links, and virtual drives. Hard links can be created in UNIX with the ln
command, or in Windows operating systems by calling the CreateHardLink()
function. Symbolic links can be created in UNIX using the ln -s
command or in Windows by using directory junctions in NTFS or the Linkd.exe (Win 2K resource kit) or "junction" freeware. Virtual drives can also be created in Windows using the subst
command.
File links can create security issues for programs that fail to consider the possibility that the file being opened may actually be a link to a different file. This is especially dangerous when the vulnerable program is running with elevated privileges.
To ensure that a program is reading from an intended file, and not a different file in another directory, it is necessary to check for the existence of symbolic or hard links.
Non-Compliant Code Example (POSIX)
This non-compliant code example open the file specified by the string "/home/rcs/.conf"
for read/write exclusive access, and then writes user supplied data to the file.
if ((fd = open("/home/rcs/.conf", O_EXCL|O_RDWR, 0600)) == -1) { /* handle error */ } write(fd, userbuf, userlen);
If the process is running with elevated privileges, an attacker can exploit this code, for example, by creating a link from .conf
to the {{/etc/passwd }} authentication file. The attacker can then overwrite data stored in the password file to create a new root account with no password. As a result, this attack can be used to gain root privileges on a vulnerable system.
Non-Compliant Code Example (POSIX)
The only function available on POSIX systems to collect information about a symbolic link rather than its target is the lstat()
function. This non-compliant code example uses the lstat()
function to collection information about the file, and then checks the st_mode
field to determine if the file is a symbolic link.
struct stat lstat_info; int fd; if (lstat("some_file", &lstat_info) == -1) { /* handle error */ } if (!S_ISLNK(lstat_info.st_mode)) { if ((fd = open("some_file", O_EXCL|O_RDWR, 0600)) == -1) { /* handle error */ } } write(fd, userbuf, userlen);
Non-Compliant Code Example (POSIX)
This non-compliant code example eliminates the race condition by:
- calling the
lstat()
the filename. - calling
open()
to open the file. - call
fstat()
on the file descriptor returned by open() - compare the fine information returned by the calls to
lstat()
andfstat()
to ensure that the files are the same.
struct stat lstat_info, fstat_info; int fd; if (lstat("some_file", &lstat_info) == -1) { /* handle error */ } if ((fd = open("some_file", O_EXCL|O_RDWR, 0600)) == -1) { /* handle error */ } if (fstat(fd, &fstat_info) == -1) { /* handle error */ } if (lstat_info.st_mode == fstat_info.st_mode && lstat_info.st_ino == fstat_info.st_ino && lstat_info.st_dev == fstat_info.st_dev) { write(fd, userbuf, userlen); }
Tihs eliminate the TOCTOU condition because fstat()
is applied to file descriptors, not file names, so the file passed to fstat()
must be identical to the file that was opened. The lstat()
function does not follow symbolic links, but fstat()
does. Comparing modes using the st_mode
field is sufficient to check for a symbolic link.
Comparing i-nodes using the st_ino
fields and devices using the st_dev
fields ensures that the file passed to lstat()
is the same as the file passed to fstat()
[[FIO05-A]].
Risk Assessment
Rule |
Severity |
Likelihood |
Remediation Cost |
Priority |
Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
POS01-A |
2 (medium) |
3 (likely) |
2 (medium) |
P12 |
L1 |
Examples of vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this recommendation can be found on the CERT website.
References
[[ISO/IEC 9899-1999]] Section 7.19.7.2, "The fgets function"
[[Seacord 05]] Chapter 7, "File I/O"