You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 76 Next »

The size of a structure is not always equal to the sum of the sizes of its members. According to Section 6.7.2.1 of the C99 standard, "There may be unnamed padding within a structure object, but not at its beginning" [ISO/IEC 9899:1999].

This is often referred to as structure padding. Structure members are arranged in memory as they are declared in the program text. Padding may be added to the structure to ensure the structure is properly aligned in memory. Structure padding allows for faster member access on many architectures.

Rearranging the fields in a struct can change the size of the struct. It is possible to minimize padding anomalies if the fields are arranged in such a way that fields of the same size are grouped together.

Padding is also referred to as struct member alignment. Many compilers provide a flag that controls how the members of a structure are packed into memory. Modifying this flag may cause the size of the structures to vary. Most compilers also include a keyword that removes all padding; the resulting structures are referred to as packed structures. Overriding the default behavior is often unwise because it leads to interface compatibility problems (the nominally same struct has its layout interpreted differently in different modules).

Noncompliant Code Example

This noncompliant code example assumes that the size of struct buffer is equal to the sum of the size of its individual components, which may not be the case [Dowd 2006]. The size of struct buffer may actually be larger due to structure padding.

enum { buffer_size = 50 };

struct buffer {
  size_t size;
  char bufferC[buffer_size];
} buff;

/* ... */

void func(const struct buffer *buf) {

  /*
   * Incorrectly assumes sizeof(struct buffer) =
   * sizeof(size_t) + sizeof(buff.bufferC) 
   */
  struct buffer *buf_cpy = (struct buffer *)malloc(
    sizeof(size_t) + sizeof(buff.bufferC)
  );

  if (buf_cpy == NULL) {
    /* Handle malloc() error */
  }

  /*
   * With padding, sizeof(struct buffer) may be greater than
   * sizeof(size_t) + sizeof(buff.bufferC), causing some data  
   * to be written outside the bounds of the memory allocated.
   */
  memcpy(buf_cpy, buf, sizeof(struct buffer));

  /* ... */

  free(buf_cpy);
}

Compliant Solution

Accounting for structure padding prevents these types of errors.

enum { buffer_size = 50 };

struct buffer {
  size_t size;
  char bufferC[buffer_size];
} buff;

/* ... */

void func(const struct buffer *buf) {

  struct buffer *buf_cpy = 
    (struct buffer *)malloc(sizeof(struct buffer));

  if (buf_cpy == NULL) {
    /* Handle malloc() error */
  }

  /* ... */

  memcpy(buf_cpy, buf, sizeof(struct buffer));

  /* ... */

  free(buf_cpy);
}

Risk Assessment

Failure to correctly determine the size of a structure can lead to subtle logic errors and incorrect calculations.

Recommendation

Severity

Likelihood

Remediation Cost

Priority

Level

EXP03-C

medium

unlikely

high

P2

L3

Related Vulnerabilities

Search for vulnerabilities resulting from the violation of this rule on the CERT website.

Related Guidelines

C++ Secure Coding Standard: EXP03-CPP. Do not assume the size of a class or struct is the sum of the sizes of its members

Bibliography

[Dowd 2006] Chapter 6, "C Language Issues" (Structure Padding 284-287)
[ISO/IEC 9899:1999] Section 6.7.2.1, "Structure and union specifiers"
[Sloss 2004] Section 5.7, "Structure Arrangement"


      03. Expressions (EXP)      EXP04-C. Do not perform byte-by-byte comparisons involving a structure

  • No labels